| Event: |
Delegate Assembly / Q3 Board Meeting |
| Dates: |
July 20-22, 2012 |
| Place: |
Sheraton Grand Sacramento
1230 J Street
Sacramento, California 95814 |
| Rate: |
$101 plus taxes for a single/$151 plus taxes for a double |
| RSVP: |
Reservations must be made no later than June 28, 2012 |
To reserve your hotel room for the event, CLICK HERE
NOTE: If you are not a member of a committee meeting at this event or a member of the board of directors, you must have your chapter president's prior approval to get reimbursed for board meeting expenses.
|
 |
Legislation & politics: Stay up to date on Capitol news, bills we follow, and more. |
 |
Get involved! Tell lawmakers, the media, and the public why your career should be better protected.
|
 |
Save money with ACSS! Discounts on tickets, travel, cars, computers, insurance and more.
|
|
Association of
California State Supervisors
1108 O Street, Suite 317
Sacramento, California 95814
(916) 326-4257 • (800) 624-2137
For questions about this site, contact Kevin Glidden at (916) 326-4302 or kglidden@calcsea.org
|
|
ACSS News
|
To view blog postings by category, click the Blog Topic of your choice at left. For questions about this Web site please email us.
Jun
8
Written by:
ACSS Communications
6/8/2010 10:44 AM
In ACSS' meet and confer with DPA Monday, Deputy Director Julie Chapman told board and staff members the 5 percent permanent pay cut has been taken off the bargaining table. DPA is asking for the additional 5 percent retirement contribution, a salary cut of one day a month in exchange for a PLP day with no cash-out value (for next year only) and an additional 5 percent cap on workforce budgets (which would not affect employees' salaries). A few revenue-generating agencies, such as the Franchise Tax Board, would be exempt from the workforce cap. DPA also supports the two-tier retirement plan, with a scaled-back plan for new hires only, and is offering to add a 5 percent step increase at the top of each salary range as mitigation. Read more in our meet and confer eblast.
Tags:
2 comment(s) so far...
Re: DPA meet & confer: 5 percent pay cut 'off the table'
That is good news. I
know of a few folks that are seriously contemplating retirment, not only because of the cut in salary, but also the possible loss of at least 5% payout on vacation/annual leave if the cut were to take effect.
Has anyone looked into whether the payout would be a the rate in effect rather than the earned rate?
By Anon at State on
6/15/2010 7:26 PM
|
Re: DPA meet & confer: 5 percent pay cut 'off the table'
The 5% pay cut off the table is great news, but what about the debacle the Governor will cause by reducing the state workers’ pay to Minimum wage? Not to mention the fact that the programming effort will be costly and is just not feasible given the amount of time the SCO has to do it. Many state workers will be forced to take a loan out to cover their bills. Some may not be able to get a loan and will just default and ruin their credit. Some will be forced to take another job and we will all lose the intellectual property that we have relied on for years. What ever happened with the wages continuation act that the legislator passed a few weeks ago? I talked to my Senator Dave Cox and he said he will not sign it. He has something else he wants to do. Mean while we all go down the tubes except the legislator.
Again the Governor is punishing the very people that are trying to help save the state. And for what, Just to help get the budget passed. Does it matter that the very people that have caused the deficient, the legislator, will not be affected? Does it matter that for the last 30 years the State of California has always spent more than they have taken in. Something is wrong with this picture. Every reportable agency has cut their budgets by 5-10% and now they want more.
If one is to look at the real problem, “Spending in the General fund”, one can easily see that there is no possible way anyone can make enough cuts to repair the deficit we have been working on for 30 years. The only solution is to raise taxes. Tax the Oil companies. Why are the oil companies in California the only ones that are not taxed in the US?
By Jeff Wilcox on
6/15/2010 7:26 PM
|
|
|